It’s shocking that Jeff Sessions recused himself from the Russia investigation.
In an interview with the New York Timeson Wednesday, Donald Trump said Jeff Sessions’ decision to recuse himself from the Russia investigation had been a grave miscalculation that had effectively disqualified him from serving as attorney general. “Sessions should have never recused himself, and if he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me before he took the job, and I would have picked somebody else,” Trump told Peter Baker, Michael S. Schmidt, and Maggie Haberman.
It sounds ridiculous. Of course Sessions had to recuse himself: As a top adviser to the Trump campaign, he could never be objective or unbiased in supervising an FBI investigation into that same campaign’s possible collusion with the Russian government. Especially in light of the Washington Post report that Sessions had met with a Russian official during his tenure as a Trump surrogate and then told Congress that he hadn’t, the recusal was a no-brainer.
But Trump was right to be shocked when Sessions willingly stepped aside. Though it may have seemed like a no-brainer at the time, the fact that Sessions did the right thing stands, in retrospect, as the biggest surprise of the Trump era so far and one of the only instances in which this administration has lived up to a typical standard of government ethics.
Simply put, Sessions could have just not recused. What was going to happen if he didn’t? Who in the administration was going to stand up and tell the attorney general that even the appearance of a potential conflict of interest is a very, very bad thing? Who was going to say publicly that staying on would violate official Department of Justice regulations, other than the usual Democratic goo-goos in the House and Senate and the self-righteous dorks in the fake news media?
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementIn the March 2 press conference in which he announced his recusal, Sessions explained that he’d consulted with senior DOJ officials before making his decision. “I asked for their candid and honest opinion about what I should do about investigations, certain investigations, and my staff recommended recusal,” he said. “They said that since I had involvement with the campaign, I should not be involved in any campaign investigation. I have studied the rules and considered their comments and evaluation. I believe those recommendations are right and just.”
In the before times, when presidential administrations behaved like presidential administrations, an attorney general’s willingness to listen to career staff on a matter of black-and-white institutional ethics wouldn’t have seemed extraordinary. Now it does, because with Trump as president, the notion that politics is governed by unchangeable laws of gravity has been exposed as a collective delusion. Under the new rules, Sessions could have remained in charge of the investigation even though he clearly shouldn’t have. Granted, it would have been impossible to justify such a decision in a rational, principled way. So what?
AdvertisementCall it nihilism if you want, but remember that Trump faced no consequential criticism from the GOP when he fired James Comey as FBI director and admitted in a television interview that he was thinking about Russia when he did it. Remember also that with the exception of this one act, Sessions’ tenure as attorney general has been marked by boundless loyalty to Trump and one broken DOJ norm after another. Against that backdrop, the recusal really does look like a very costly unforced error—one that led directly to the empowerment of stubborn institutionalists Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general, and Robert Mueller, the special counsel now in charge of the Russia investigation.
Advertisement AdvertisementSure, there would have been calls from Democrats for Sessions to resign. If the attorney general takes seriously his duty to protect the integrity and independence of the Justice Department, he has no choice but to step aside, they would have said, probably on Twitter.Sure, career attorneys at DOJ might have raised a stink if he defied their recommendation. According to three people with knowledge of internal Justice Department discussions, attorneys consulted on the recusal question are reeling after an extraordinary rebuke by Sessions, a newspaper would have reported, probably on its front page.
Maybe it would have been slightly unpleasant for Sessions to tune out that static. More likely, it would have been easy, especially compared with the grief he’s taking now from the guy in the Oval Office who actually has the power to fire him. All Sessions had to do was nothing. Looking back, it would have been just one more act of defiance the political establishment and the public would’ve been forced to accept.
Tweet Share Share Comment-
Military prosecutors indict intel official over leaking 'black agent' infoN. Korea arrests retired official for criticizing Kim JongPlease reserve the stairs meme for your strongest opinions onlySeoul City approves Shilla’s hanok hotel plan21 College and University MuseumsTesla gave electric cars a huge push toward normalcyBill Cosby convicted of sexual assaultProsecutors investigate alleged corruption in arms dealingPS5 Pro: There are new whispers that the release date is fast approachingDoes Kanye West know how to retweet?
- ·Number of COVID
- ·回眸2023,我们见证了”村BA”这些闪耀时刻
- ·全国农产品品质规格营养功能评价江门技术中心揭牌
- ·'Silicon Valley' stars say they were harassed by Trump supporters
- ·13 Unbelievable Underwater Wonders in Florida
- ·Seoul City approves Shilla’s hanok hotel plan
- ·John McCain doesn't want Trump at his funeral
- ·7 perfect 'Harry Potter' spin
- ·雨城区疾控中心提示:科学补碘 防治碘缺乏病
- ·Congrats to Ben Platt on joining John Krasinski and Emily Blunt's marriage
- ·N. Korea remains low key over anniversary of 'nuclear armament'
- ·Adam Rippon and US Olympic stars skip White House meeting with Trump
- ·World's first green ammonia plant is now open for business
- ·上半年我市高速公路完成投资逾12亿元
- ·Lego will no longer give away free toys with the Daily Mail
- ·Lego will no longer give away free toys with the Daily Mail
- ·7 Reasons to Explore Boston’s Lesser
- ·Facebook will undergo liberal bias and civil rights audits
- ·N.K. ups tension with short
- ·Koreas to connect road inside heavily fortified DMZ
- ·Number of COVID
- ·Artificial intelligence in 2017 still can't truly understand humans
- ·Chinese drivers try to deter high
- ·Let's take a moment to appreciate the Cleveland Browns, their fans and their 0
- ·Smiley face on Mars is a telltale sign of its past
- ·Koreas to connect road inside heavily fortified DMZ
- ·Nvidia GeForce Now Ultimate vs. New Graphics Card
- ·F.M. lashes out at N.K for provocations
- ·任重道更远 椽笔绘宏篇
- ·Koreas to connect road inside heavily fortified DMZ
- ·Naver, Kakao strive to combat deepfake porn spreading online
- ·Facebook: It's 'not true' that we withheld News Feed update to battle fake news
- ·Writers hop on Twitter to air out their weirdest celebrity interview
- ·China media urge N. Korea to change 'self
- ·The Techies Who Lunch
- ·Wood's penalty takes Newcastle nearer survival