Court to face hurdles in impeachment witness questioning
时间:2024-09-23 04:25:54 来源:玉林新闻
For the Constitutional Court, the main challenge in judging President Park Geun-hye’s impeachment is questioning the dozens of listed witnesses and confirming the suggested allegations within due time, especially as key figures are either denying the charges or avoiding the trial altogether.
The fundamental cause of this deadlock is that Park, as well as her disputed confidante Choi Soon-sil who stands at the core of the extensive corruption scandal, has utterly denied the grounds brought forward against her.
Only after confirming the disputed facts, which constitute the reasons of impeachment, may the top court move on to its legal judgment process and decide whether or not to oust the president as demanded by the legislature.
The court on Thursday held its first witness interrogation for the impeachment trial, but made slow progress on fact-finding, mostly due to the absence of three pivotal figures -- two former senior Cheong Wa Dae officials and Park herself.
Constitutional Court holds 2nd hearing on Park impeachment case(Yonhap)Lee Jae-man and Ahn Bong-geun, two of the three presidential secretaries dubbed the “doorknob trio” due to their exclusive connection to the reclusive Park, continued to remain in hiding, making no response to the court summoning.
The embattled Park did not attend the proceedings either, only speaking through her lawyers, who called for more rigorous proof to justify the elected president’s removal from power.
Under Clause 84 of the nation’s Constitution, an incumbent president may not be charged with a criminal offense except for insurrection or treason. Though confusion exists on whether a suspended president is also subject to such an exemption, it is being widely speculated that Park will not show up during the impeachment trial process.
Observers point out that the Constitutional Court, whose main function is to judge the constitutional conformity of laws and administrative measures, will rush through the normative process once the fact-finding is done.
But the problem is that Park has been refuting all of the circumstances the National Assembly listed in the impeachment statement, much in contrast to her predecessor in impeachment, former President Roh Moo-hyun.
The late liberal president, when facing his impeachment trial in 2004 over an alleged breach of political neutrality, acknowledged the facts listed in his impeachment resolution, allowing the court to jump to its normative judgment.
Since the Choi scandal broke out in late October last year, President Park has delivered three official addresses to the nation, in which she mostly claimed innocence over Choi’s alleged influence-peddling acts. In an unheralded press meeting held recently on New Year’s Day, she once again complained of injustice and denied the charges, especially her involvement in the alleged bribery allegations.
Considering such circumstances, it is highly likely that Park’s legal team will continue to raise doubts on the credibility of the evidence submitted by prosecutors and lawmakers, as well as that of the written testimonies that are unfavorable for Park.
Should the plaintiff -- the parliamentary impeachment committee -- and the defendant plunge into a lengthy cross-examination process on each other’s key witnesses, the court ruling will inevitably face a delay, which will in turn put off the timeline for the next presidential election.
The deadline for the Constitutional Court to finalize its stance on impeachment is six months from the submission of the resolution, which will be in early June. The top court, however, has been hinting at speeding up its process, so as to minimize the vacuum in state affairs.
The process for the late Roh took about two months.
By Bae Hyun-jung (tellme@heraldcorp.com)
The fundamental cause of this deadlock is that Park, as well as her disputed confidante Choi Soon-sil who stands at the core of the extensive corruption scandal, has utterly denied the grounds brought forward against her.
Only after confirming the disputed facts, which constitute the reasons of impeachment, may the top court move on to its legal judgment process and decide whether or not to oust the president as demanded by the legislature.
The court on Thursday held its first witness interrogation for the impeachment trial, but made slow progress on fact-finding, mostly due to the absence of three pivotal figures -- two former senior Cheong Wa Dae officials and Park herself.
The embattled Park did not attend the proceedings either, only speaking through her lawyers, who called for more rigorous proof to justify the elected president’s removal from power.
Under Clause 84 of the nation’s Constitution, an incumbent president may not be charged with a criminal offense except for insurrection or treason. Though confusion exists on whether a suspended president is also subject to such an exemption, it is being widely speculated that Park will not show up during the impeachment trial process.
Observers point out that the Constitutional Court, whose main function is to judge the constitutional conformity of laws and administrative measures, will rush through the normative process once the fact-finding is done.
But the problem is that Park has been refuting all of the circumstances the National Assembly listed in the impeachment statement, much in contrast to her predecessor in impeachment, former President Roh Moo-hyun.
The late liberal president, when facing his impeachment trial in 2004 over an alleged breach of political neutrality, acknowledged the facts listed in his impeachment resolution, allowing the court to jump to its normative judgment.
Since the Choi scandal broke out in late October last year, President Park has delivered three official addresses to the nation, in which she mostly claimed innocence over Choi’s alleged influence-peddling acts. In an unheralded press meeting held recently on New Year’s Day, she once again complained of injustice and denied the charges, especially her involvement in the alleged bribery allegations.
Considering such circumstances, it is highly likely that Park’s legal team will continue to raise doubts on the credibility of the evidence submitted by prosecutors and lawmakers, as well as that of the written testimonies that are unfavorable for Park.
Should the plaintiff -- the parliamentary impeachment committee -- and the defendant plunge into a lengthy cross-examination process on each other’s key witnesses, the court ruling will inevitably face a delay, which will in turn put off the timeline for the next presidential election.
The deadline for the Constitutional Court to finalize its stance on impeachment is six months from the submission of the resolution, which will be in early June. The top court, however, has been hinting at speeding up its process, so as to minimize the vacuum in state affairs.
The process for the late Roh took about two months.
By Bae Hyun-jung (tellme@heraldcorp.com)
-
Abrar Ahmed returns as Pakistan names squad for second Test against BangladeshFans are having a sexy good time with the new 'Mass Effect' trailer农民需要什么 他们就演什么Alexa and Cortana integration now available on Windows 10 and EchoHow to unblock Xnxx for freeKey Clinton adviser calls for greater contingency planning on N. KoreaU.N. Security Council hold emergency meeting on N. Korean missile launchesJon Stewart returns to Capitol Hill to fight for 9/11 first responders fundingTrump trials: Jack Smith is reportedly reconsidering his strategy.Here's the app you need to make your iPhone photos look good enough for Tim Cook to share
上一篇:Google is bringing AI summaries to ‘Files’ so you can find your docs quicker
下一篇:New Grok response directs users to Vote.gov for election questions
下一篇:New Grok response directs users to Vote.gov for election questions
相关内容
- ·Value Judgment
- ·Police find viral ice cream licker, but there's a catfish twist
- ·Presidents Cup win boosts US confidence
- ·扎实苦干挑重担 平凡岗位显身手
- ·Google Gemini now allows AI
- ·Jon Stewart returns to Capitol Hill to fight for 9/11 first responders funding
- ·Army unveils reconnaissance drill near DMZ amid growing N.K. threats
- ·雨城区:培育林竹产业跨新步
- ·Gastro Obscura's Guide to Where to Eat in Nashville
- ·Bride perfectly trolls her groom in a ridiculous T
- ·Alexa and Cortana integration now available on Windows 10 and Echo
- ·Trump is going to build that damn wall and all people can talk about is avocados
- ·Pragmocracy Now
- ·This is why you should never, ever drink 'tea' you find lying around
- ·11 of the wildest bottle cap challenges
- ·Apple Car could launch between 2023 and 2025
最新内容
- ·When will Trump and Harris debate? The presidential campaigns snipe over ABC News’ rules.
- ·Instagram can't stop flood of grisly photos from Bianca Devins' murder
- ·Roger Federer: Enfant terrible to saintly global icon
- ·富硒寿乡,连州超40万亩良田开耕!
- ·Expanded police surveillance will get us “broken windows” on steroids.
- ·Another Roomba ran over dog poop and then proceeded to 'clean' the house
- ·Senior North Korean official meets with Brazilian leader in Rio
- ·North Korea to hold conference on '3 revolutions' to bolster internal unity
- ·25 Years Later: A Brief Analysis of GPU Processing Efficiency
- ·Motorboat knocks Oxford student dead in Yangpyeong
推荐内容
热点内容
- ·'Black Myth: Wukong' PS5 review in progress: A potential masterpiece
- ·Federer relishes 'different' future after final bow
- ·3D gun group skirts law by selling blueprint files on flash drives
- ·Motorboat knocks Oxford student dead in Yangpyeong
- ·'Terminator Zero' creators find fresh life in sci
- ·Justin Trudeau takes on Trump with a perfectly timed photo
- ·Apple Car could launch between 2023 and 2025
- ·成雅铁路可研现场踏勘座谈会召开
- ·Essential Apps to Install on your Windows PC or Mac
- ·How to learn the basics of floral design online