Does anyone actually doubt Trump is not mentally fit for office?
Given everything that’s happened since the start of the year, it’s easy to forget that just this past week President Donald Trump was tweeting what appeared to be nuclear threats against North Korea made up of equal parts Freud and a celebration of his own big-boy underpants. That tweet initially reignited a renewed debate around the 25thAmendment option of replacing a president who is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office”—arguments that were soon propelled into the stratosphere by the blockbuster revelations in Michael Wolff’s new book Fire and Fury.
Whatever you may think of Wolff’s dubious journalistic purity, there can be no doubt that the cumulative impact of his book has been to reconfirm everything everyone believed they already knew to be true about Trump’s mental state.
As former Bush White House official Michael Gerson offers, it’s incredibly hard to attribute a cognitive decline in President Trump that might necessitate removal from office when the bar was so low to begin with:
AdvertisementTrump is exhibiting a set of compulsions and delusions that have characterized his entire adult life. You can’t have declining judgment that never existed. You can’t lose a grasp on reality you never possessed. What is most striking is not Trump’s disintegration but his utter consistency.
This has always been the problem in assessing Donald Trump’s mental fitness to be president. The truth is that Americans—or a minority of them with an assist from the Electoral College—determined that this man, fully realized as a narcissist without basic skills for executive leadership, was fit for office in 2016. But as Politicoreported, the daily, almost hourly manifestations of presidential instability have led to an upsurge in discussions around using the constitutional-fitness lever to oust Trump. Richard Painter, who served as chief White House ethics lawyer under President George W. Bush, wrote on Twitter that the nuclear-button threat “alone is grounds for removal from office under the 25thAmendment. This man should not have nukes.” What followed was a spate of articles about whether questioning the president’s mental health is appropriate, likely to change anything, likely to backfire, or too costly to the political cause of saving us all from his madness?
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementTrump tried to smooth the waters this past weekend by reassuring us via Twitter that he is “not [merely] smart, but genius….and a very stable genius at that!” This message of protestation doesn’t seem to have helped anything for anyone.
Rep. Jamie Raskin actually introduced a House bill last spring seeking to address these questions legislatively. The Oversight Commission on Presidential Capacity Act seeks to create a “body” that will be prepared to assess whether the president is unable to execute the duties of his office. After I emailed him following the latest wave of 25thAmendment talk, Raskin told me this:
Advertisement We don’t need Wolff’s book to identify the ways in which the president is not by temperament or character fit for office.The 25th Amendment was adopted in the nuclear age, and all Americans should be equally invested for the sake of our people in the basic physical, mental and neurological capacity of the president to do the job.
This proposed legislation, which Raskin says has the backing of 60 Democratic co-sponsors and no Republicans, does not mention President Trump by name. It calls for an independent bipartisan body made up of elder statespersons, physicians, and psychiatrists. Per the 25thAmendment itself, such a body could only make a recommendation, which would need to be approved by the vice president and two-thirds of both branches of Congress if the president were to contest it. The implication here is this: Impeachment is inescapably and overwhelmingly a political question, but presidential capacity should overwhelmingly be a medical and practical one.
AdvertisementIt seems to me, though, that Raskin has identified the central irony of this political moment: We don’t need Wolff’s book, or even an independent commission, to identify the ways in which the president is not by temperament or character fit for office. This is all already widely known, and spoken aloud, even by his Cabinet members and Republican officeholders. The problem is in developing a process of amassing evidence to reach a conclusion that would require Congress and the Cabinet to act, in contravention of their own parochial interests and the 2016 vote. Republicans have showed no intention of acting in any way against this president. And as my colleague Jamelle Bouie notes here, that is where the system breaks down.
Advertisement AdvertisementA few weeks ago, I wrote a similarly dispiriting column about the ways in which Robert Mueller—following a scrupulous and comprehensive investigation—might produce an airtight legal case against the president. I very reluctantly concluded:
Advertisement Advertisement[W]e should accept the possibility that Mueller may come to represent the highest and most binding expression of law and order in America. We also must acknowledge the reality that the highest and most binding expression of law and order in America might not matter enough, to enough people, to bring the Trump train to a stop.
It is perfectly rational to believe that Trump should currently be trapped in the pincer grip of the Mueller investigation on the one side and the mounting evidence of his unfitness on the other.
AdvertisementBut for either of those two scenarios to play out, it will require more than merely a return to constitutional and legal norms. It will require that Republicans in the House and Senate loudly declaim what they may only whisper to their congressional aides and anxious therapists. What we have seen, instead, is the opposite. GOP senators like Bob Corker and Lindsey Graham who were once bellwethers for norm preservation are suddenly back in the president’s corner, pompoms waving wildly.
Senators like Jeff Flake who once gave eloquent speeches about good governance have slid into constitutional screen-saver mode, with cheery plans to spend more time with their families. Senators who once threatened to go all statesmanlike if the independence of Robert Mueller or Jeff Sessions were threatened now daily threaten the independence of Robert Mueller and Jeff Sessions. Whatever minimal vestiges of Never Trump once existed among Republican lawmakers in the first year of his presidency have evaporated, just as the rest of us have come to see with perfect clarity how dangerous this presidency is.
To be certain, constant talk of the 25thAmendment option, or of a successful Mueller probe potentially leading to impeachment, should in no way recede. It is more important than ever to go through the formal legal exercise of amassing evidence, building processes, and bolstering the legal and political institutions that should be brought to bear in a functioning constitutional democracy. But this is ultimately now a politics problem, not a legal one. Winning elections—answering power with power—is the only solution that can possibly guarantee the future of our democracy and our country. To count on GOP participation in that project is clearly futile: It is too late for them to course-correct and long past time we recognized that.
Tweet Share Share Comment-
'Hyundai Way': Auto giant's W121tr plan aims to seize mobility market leadThe Best AMD Ryzen Gaming Laptops (So Far)Google is bringing AI summaries to ‘Files’ so you can find your docs quickerWashington Mystics vs. Chicago Sky 2024 livestream: Watch live WNBAProject 2025 Comstock Act: Trump’s new abortion comment exposed.Yoon, US Senate's armed service committee chief discuss alliance, N.K. threatsHow much for Oasis tickets? Fans joke about splurging on reunion showsScientists discover where the huge dinosaurFirst officially approved Gen IV nuclear reactor in the US breaks ground9 Planetariums to Get Lost in the Cosmos
下一篇:Amazon Android Days sale 2024: Save on unlocked phones, tablets, and more
- ·I went to an offline dating event for singles. Here's how it went.
- ·21 Lost and Lonely Cemeteries
- ·2016's $400 GPU vs. 2019's $400 GPUs
- ·To Russia, with Love
- ·Travel Back in Time and Uncover Old
- ·The Best AMD Ryzen Gaming Laptops (So Far)
- ·Number of COVID
- ·'Black Myth: Wukong' PS5 review in progress: A potential masterpiece
- ·The Weird, Wonderful World of Water Towers
- ·Pakistan Cricket at crossroads after shock defeat at Pindi
- ·The Future of Tech: The Desktop PC
- ·Yoon touts pension reform drive amid stagnant popularity rating
- ·夜间献血模式“上线”
- ·NASA says Earth just had the hottest day ever recorded
- ·21 College and University Museums
- ·18 Places for Epic Outdoor Adventure Across Colorado
- ·Venture Missionaries
- ·Ford can make your Mustang Mach
- ·18 Slightly Submerged Architectural Wonders
- ·Where to pre
- ·Amazon Android Days sale 2024: Save on unlocked phones, tablets, and more
- ·Sports minister says audits into football, badminton federations set to conclude in Sept.
- ·The Best AMD Ryzen Gaming Laptops (So Far)
- ·Yes, big spiders are spreading in the U.S. No, they're not flying.
- ·What to expect when a tech bubble bursts
- ·US to oppose North Korean worker dispatch to occupied Ukrainian territory: State Dept.
- ·Ruling bloc seeks tougher sentences for deepfake sex crimes
- ·Ford can make your Mustang Mach
- ·13 Unbelievable Underwater Wonders in Florida
- ·11 Places to See Tiny Trains
- ·Update your BIOS: Utilities from Top Motherboard Makers
- ·Webb telescope just snapped image of huge black hole gobbling material
- ·The Astounding World of Automata
- ·[From the Scene] How ‘world’s first oil town’ is wrestling to become ‘green'
- ·Scientists detect water sloshing on Mars. There could be a lot.
- ·Sports minister says audits into football, badminton federations set to conclude in Sept.